Table 2 |
||||
|
Association between proximity to fast food and area deprivation, using multivariate linear regression model |
||||
|
Access as network distance to the nearest |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Fast-food restaurant |
Fast-food opportunity |
Variety healthier entrée options |
Variety healthier side dish options |
|
|
|
||||
|
Deprivation |
b (SE) |
b (SE) |
b (SE) |
b (SE) |
|
|
||||
|
High |
-5.46 (0.131)‡ |
-3.43 (0.71)‡ |
-4.72 (1.23)‡ |
-6.76 (1.48)‡ |
|
Medium |
-1.89 (1.11) |
-1.56 (0.60)† |
-1.07(1.04) |
-2.14 (1.25) |
|
|
||||
|
R2 |
0.336 |
0.345 |
0.323 |
0.358 |
|
P |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
|
|
||||
|
NOTE: The four equations were simultaneously estimated, controlling for population density. Deprivation was entered as categorical variable; low deprivation is referent group. Population density entered as continuous variable. Results reported as multivariate-adjusted b (SE). Statistically significant variables are indicated as: *< 0.05 †< 0.01 ‡< 0.001 |
||||
|
Sharkey et al. Nutrition Journal 2011 10:10 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-10 |
||||
