Table 2

Per capita trends (kcal/d), amount per consumer, % consumers by beverage category in US children 6-11 y old (1989-2008), nationally representative1, 2.

CSFII 1989-1991

NHANES 2005-2006

NHANES 2007-2008

Per Capita Trends (kcal/day)

% Cons.

Amt. Per Cons. (kcal/day)

Per Capita Trends

(kcal/day

% Cons.

Amt. Per Cons. (kcal/day)

Per Capita Trends (kcal/day)

% Cons.

Amt. Per Cons. (kcal/day)


Sugar Sweetened Bev. (SSB)

130

± 11

79%

166

± 11

190*

± 9

88%*

214

± 8

209*

± 8

91%*

231

± 9

fruit drinks and soda

90

± 6

67%

134

± 6

114*

± 6

79%*

144

± 6

118*

± 6

77%*

153

± 7

low fat high sugar milk

1

± 1

2%

88

± 9

15*

± 2

12%*

116

± 9

5*†

± 1

6%*†

88

± 6

high fat high sugar milk

28

± 5

19%

147

± 12

44*

± 4

28%*

160

± 7

63*†

± 4

39%*†

163

± 9

sports drinks

1

± 0

2%

64

± 9

9*

± 1

11%*

84

± 11

9*

± 1

12%*

76

± 10

sweetened tea and coffee

10

± 2

13%

73

± 8

7

± 1

12%

59

± 6

12 V

± 2

19%†

63

± 6

other sugar drinks

0

± 0

1%

24

± 8

1

± 0

1%

84

± 26

2*

± 1

2%

126

± 32

Caloric Nutritional Bev. (CNB)

210

± 4

92%

228

± 5

140*

± 5

83%*

170

± 6

134*

± 6

81%*

166

± 6

high fat low sugar milk

168

± 4

84%

200

± 7

97*

± 4

67%*

146

± 5

85*

± 5

64%*

134

± 6

100% juice (fruit + vegetable)

42

± 2

46%

91

± 5

43

± 3

49%

88

± 3

48

± 5

50%

97

± 6

Low Calorie Bev. (LCB)

30

± 2

33%

91

± 8

30

± 5

42%*

72

± 9

27

± 3

40%

66

± 5

low fat low sugar milk

21

± 1

15%

142

± 14

24

± 4

23%*

104

± 10

17

± 2

19%

90

± 7

unsweetened tea and coffee

0

± 0

5%

2

± 0

0

± 0

2%*

3

± 1

0

± 0

3%

2

± 0

total diet drinks

9

± 2

17%

54

± 6

6

± 1

24%

25

± 3

10†

± 2

26%*

38

± 4

diet drinks

0

± 0

5%

3

± 1

1*

± 0

15%*

6

± 1

1*

± 0

13%*

9

± 1

diet tea and coffee

9

± 2

12%

73

± 10

5

± 1

10%

52

± 7

9†

± 1

15%†

58

± 7


1 The studied sample included children aged 6-11 y old from 3 nationally representative surveys: CSFII 1989-1991, NHANES 2005-2006 and 2007-2008.

2 Differences were tested using Student's t test. Comparing with 1989: * P < 0.05, comparing with 2005: † P < 0.05.

Lasater et al. Nutrition Journal 2011 10:103   doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-103

Open Data