Table 2 |
|||
|
Diabetes status and race as factors of APP* |
|||
|
Independent Variables |
B-unstandardized coefficient (95% CI) |
SE |
P* |
|
|
|||
|
Diabetes (Yes) |
0.113 (0.075, 0.151) |
0.018 |
< 0.001 |
|
|
|||
|
Race |
- |
- |
< 0.001 |
|
MA |
0.057 (0.11, 0.103) |
0.022 |
0.019 |
|
BNH |
0.062(0.021, 0.104) |
0.020 |
0.006 |
|
WNH (reference) † |
|||
|
Diabetes (yes)*RACE [F(2,15) = 4.54] |
- |
- |
0.029 |
|
Diabetes (yes) MA |
-0.45(-0.122, 0.032) |
0.036 |
0.232 |
|
Diabetes (yes) BNH |
-0.096(-0.168,-0.023) |
0.034 |
0.013 |
|
WNH (reference) ‡ |
|||
|
Covariates |
|||
|
Current Smoker (yes) |
0.026 (0.006, 0.046) |
0.009 |
0.015 |
|
Age |
0.008 (0.008, 0.009) |
0.0001 |
< 0.001 |
|
Gender |
0.015 (-0.015,0.045) |
0.014 |
0.312 |
|
BMI (m/kg2) |
0.048(-0.022, 0.118) |
0.033 |
0.163 |
|
Kcal |
-0.001(-0.002, 0.001) |
0.001 |
0.214 |
|
|
|||
|
Dependent Variable: APP Model summary: R2 = 0.178; F (10,7) = 52.7; p < 0.001 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Abbreviations: MA = Mexican American; BNH = Black, non-Hispanic; WNH = White, non-Hispanic; APP = arterial pulse pressure; Kcal = kilocalories per day (energy intake); BMI = body mass index. * Complete data were available for N = 4237 participants and sample weights were applied. BMI was natural log-transformed and Kcal was transformed by the square root. † MA and BNH are compared to WNH regarding APP and have higher APP than WNH (positive coefficient). ‡ MA and BNH with diabetes are compared to WNH with diabetes and have lower APP (negative coefficients, significant for MA, only) |
|||
|
Vaccaro and Huffman Nutrition Journal 2011 10:126 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-126 |
|||
