Table 4

Statistical analysis for prediction equations that are not in agreement with direct 24-hour metabolic measurements

Prediction

Value

Difference1

P

Agreement2

Equation

(Mean ± SD)

(%)

(Paired T-test)

(Bland & Altman ± 2SD)


EMTACEE-LWT

86.6 ± 3.3

11.2 ± 12.7

<0.01

7.9 ± 19.2


EMTACRMR-LWT

73.3 ± 3.2

11.4 ± 9.3

<0.01

7.3 ± 11.2


WHO

53.6 ± 0.8

-18.6 ± 5.5

<0.01

-12.4 ± 8.2


SCH-WT

54.9 ± 0.8

-16.6 ± 5.1

<0.01

-11.1 ± 7.6


SCH-LWT

57.9 ± 5.6

-12.2 ± 9.0

<0.01

-8.1 ± 11.8


OXFORD-WT

56.2 ± 0.6

-14.7 ± 5.2

<0.01

-9.9 ± 7.6


OXFORD-LWT

58.1 ± 3.1

-11.9 ± 6.2

<0.01

-8.0 ± 8.6


1 = ((calculated value from the corresponding prediction equation-reference metabolic parameter/reference metabolic parameter)*100)

2 = Proximity to zero calculated as the difference between the reference metabolic parameter and the calculated value from the corresponding prediction equation (± 2 standard deviations) [13]

Rising Nutrition Journal 2011 10:14   doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-14

Open Data