Table 4 

Statistical analysis for prediction equations that are not in agreement with direct 24hour metabolic measurements 

Prediction 
Value 
Difference^{1} 
P 
Agreement^{2} 
Equation 
(Mean ± SD) 
(%) 
(Paired Ttest) 
(Bland & Altman ± 2SD) 


EMTACEELWT 
86.6 ± 3.3 
11.2 ± 12.7 
<0.01 
7.9 ± 19.2 


EMTACRMRLWT 
73.3 ± 3.2 
11.4 ± 9.3 
<0.01 
7.3 ± 11.2 


WHO 
53.6 ± 0.8 
18.6 ± 5.5 
<0.01 
12.4 ± 8.2 


SCHWT 
54.9 ± 0.8 
16.6 ± 5.1 
<0.01 
11.1 ± 7.6 


SCHLWT 
57.9 ± 5.6 
12.2 ± 9.0 
<0.01 
8.1 ± 11.8 


OXFORDWT 
56.2 ± 0.6 
14.7 ± 5.2 
<0.01 
9.9 ± 7.6 


OXFORDLWT 
58.1 ± 3.1 
11.9 ± 6.2 
<0.01 
8.0 ± 8.6 


^{1 }= ((calculated value from the corresponding prediction equationreference metabolic parameter/reference metabolic parameter)*100) ^{2 }= Proximity to zero calculated as the difference between the reference metabolic parameter and the calculated value from the corresponding prediction equation (± 2 standard deviations) [13] 

Rising Nutrition Journal 2011 10:14 doi:10.1186/147528911014 