Table 4 |
||||
|
Statistical analysis for prediction equations that are not in agreement with direct 24-hour metabolic measurements |
||||
|
Prediction |
Value |
Difference1 |
P |
Agreement2 |
|
Equation |
(Mean ± SD) |
(%) |
(Paired T-test) |
(Bland & Altman ± 2SD) |
|
|
||||
|
EMTACEE-LWT |
86.6 ± 3.3 |
11.2 ± 12.7 |
<0.01 |
7.9 ± 19.2 |
|
|
||||
|
EMTACRMR-LWT |
73.3 ± 3.2 |
11.4 ± 9.3 |
<0.01 |
7.3 ± 11.2 |
|
|
||||
|
WHO |
53.6 ± 0.8 |
-18.6 ± 5.5 |
<0.01 |
-12.4 ± 8.2 |
|
|
||||
|
SCH-WT |
54.9 ± 0.8 |
-16.6 ± 5.1 |
<0.01 |
-11.1 ± 7.6 |
|
|
||||
|
SCH-LWT |
57.9 ± 5.6 |
-12.2 ± 9.0 |
<0.01 |
-8.1 ± 11.8 |
|
|
||||
|
OXFORD-WT |
56.2 ± 0.6 |
-14.7 ± 5.2 |
<0.01 |
-9.9 ± 7.6 |
|
|
||||
|
OXFORD-LWT |
58.1 ± 3.1 |
-11.9 ± 6.2 |
<0.01 |
-8.0 ± 8.6 |
|
|
||||
|
1 = ((calculated value from the corresponding prediction equation-reference metabolic parameter/reference metabolic parameter)*100) 2 = Proximity to zero calculated as the difference between the reference metabolic parameter and the calculated value from the corresponding prediction equation (± 2 standard deviations) [13] |
||||
|
Rising Nutrition Journal 2011 10:14 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-14 |
||||
