Reproducibility and validity of the food frequency questionnaire for estimating habitual dietary intake in children and adolescents
1 Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, School of Natural Science and Ecological Awareness, Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Nara Women’s University, Kitauoya-nishimachi, Nara, 630-8506, Japan
2 Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Environmental Sciences, Mukogawa Women's University, 6-46 Ikebiraki-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8558, Japan
3 Sanpoku Primary School in Murakami City, 526 Horinouchi, Murakami, Niigata, 959-3905, Japan
4 Department of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Faculty of Human Life and Environment, Nara Women’s University, Kitauoya-nishimachi, Nara, 630-8506, Japan
5 Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Wellness, Shigakukan university, 55 Nadakayama, Yokone-cho, Daifu, Aichi, 474-8651, Japan
6 Laboratory of Statistics, School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
7 School of Human Science and Environment, University of Hyogo, 1-1-12 Motomachi-cho, Shinzaike, Himezi, 670-0092, Japan
Nutrition Journal 2011, 10:27 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-27Published: 24 March 2011
A previous study reported the development a 75-item food frequency questionnaire for Japanese children (CFFQ). The first aim was to examine the reproducibility and validity of the CFFQ in order to assess dietary intake among two groups; 3-11 year old children (YC group) and 12-16 year old children (AD group). The second aim was to use the CFFQ and the FFQ for adults (AFFQ), and to determine which was better suited for assessing the intake of children in each group.
A total of the 103 children participated in this study. The interval between the first CFFQ and AFFQ and the second CFFQ and AFFQ was one month. Four weighted dietary records (WDRs) were conducted once a week. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the first and second FFQs were calculated to test the reproducibility of each FFQ. Pearson's correlation coefficients between WDRs and the second FFQ were calculated for the unadjusted value and sex-, age-, and energy-adjusted values to determine the validity of each FFQ.
The final number of subjects participating in the analysis was 89. The median correlation coefficients between the first and second CFFQs and AFFQs were 0.76 and 0.73, respectively. There was some over/underestimation of nutrients in the CFFQ of the YC group and in the AFFQ of the AD group. The medians of the sex-, age-, and energy-adjusted correlation coefficients were not different between the YC and AD groups for each FFQ. The correlation coefficient in sex-, age-, and energy-adjusted value revealed that the largest number of subject with high (0.50 or more) value was obtained by the CFFQ in the YC group.
This study indicated that the CFFQ might be a useful tool for assessing habitual dietary intake of children in the YC group. Although the CFFQ agreed moderately with habitual intake, it was found to underestimate intake in theAD group. However, for the AFFQ, the ability to rank habitual intake was low. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a new FFQ or modify an existing FFQ to accurately assess the habitual diet of children in the AD group.