Table 3 |
||||
|
Comparison of changes in dietary intakesa |
||||
|
Baseline mean (SD) |
Week 8 mean (SD) |
Difference (95% CI)b |
Pc |
|
|
|
||||
|
Energy (KJ) |
||||
|
HP |
8123 (2153) |
6509 (1351) |
||
|
HFib |
8486 (2000) |
5976 (925) |
580 (9, 1150) |
0.047 |
|
Protein (%) |
||||
|
HP |
18 (5) |
28 (5) |
||
|
HFib |
18 (4) |
22 (3) |
5.6 (3.7, 7.5) |
< 0.001 |
|
Protein (g) |
||||
|
HP |
82 (22) |
104 (16) |
||
|
HFib |
86 (18) |
76 (11) |
28 (21, 35) |
< 0.001 |
|
Animal protein (g) |
||||
|
HP |
53 (19) |
76 (14) |
||
|
HFib |
54 (16) |
56 (14) |
21 (14, 28) |
< 0.001 |
|
Fat (%) |
||||
|
HP |
33 (8) |
29 (5) |
||
|
HFib |
31 (7) |
23 (6) |
5.8 (2.9, 8.8) |
< 0.001 |
|
Saturated fat (%) |
||||
|
HP |
13 (3) |
9 (4) |
||
|
HFib |
13 (4) |
6 (3) |
3.0 (1.5, 4.7) |
0.001 |
|
CHO (%) |
||||
|
HP |
45 (6) |
40 (6) |
||
|
HFib |
47 (7) |
51 (6) |
-11.1 (-14.2, -8.1) |
< 0.001 |
|
Dietary fiber (g/day) |
||||
|
HP |
25 (10) |
24 (8) |
||
|
HFib |
26 (7) |
39 (11) |
-14.2 (-18.9, -9.5) |
< 0.001 |
|
Soluble dietary fiber (g/day) |
||||
|
HP |
12 (5) |
10 (3) |
||
|
HFib |
12 (3) |
16 (5) |
-5.2 (-7.2, -3.2) |
< 0.001 |
|
Insoluble dietary fiber (g/day) |
||||
|
HP |
13 (5) |
14 (5) |
||
|
HFib |
14 (5) |
23 (7) |
-8.9 (-12.0, -5.9) |
< 0.001 |
|
Sodium (mg/d) |
||||
|
HP |
2479 (909) |
2049 (677) |
||
|
HFib |
2745 (840) |
2125 (498) |
-15 (-264, 294) |
0.912 |
|
Alcohol (g) |
||||
|
HP |
6 (9) |
3 (5) |
||
|
HFib |
5 (9) |
2 (5) |
0.4 (-1.6, 2.4) |
0.693 |
|
|
||||
|
a High protein diet (HP) n = 33 records, and high fiber diet (HFib), n = 36 records; b difference between HP and HFib diets estimated by ANCOVA with adjustment for baseline value; c p-value for the difference between the HP and HFib diets |
||||
|
Te Morenga et al. Nutrition Journal 2011 10:40 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-40 |
||||
