Table 3 |
|||||||||
|
Endogenous DNA damage and DNA repair activity in lymphocytes, before and after kiwifruit intervention; Arbitrary units (n = 24) |
|||||||||
|
Fruits |
Before |
After |
Diff |
Differ (%) |
p |
||||
|
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
FPG-sensitive sites |
1 |
196.38 |
73.7 |
130.33 |
85.3 |
-66.05 |
112.7 |
-34 |
0.01 |
|
2 |
188.58 |
61.5 |
148.26 |
106.7 |
-40.32 |
123.2 |
-21 |
0.12 |
|
|
Endonuclease III-sensitive sites1 |
1 |
139.42 |
71.1 |
104.00 |
59.8 |
-35.42 |
92.9 |
-25 |
0.20 |
|
2 |
138.17 |
41.2 |
92.25 |
62.1 |
-45.92 |
74.5 |
-33 |
0.04 |
|
|
Resistance towards H2O2 oxidation |
1 |
283.08 |
43.9 |
189.25 |
117.2 |
-93.83 |
125.2 |
-33 |
0.00 |
|
2 |
278.00 |
51.6 |
191.52 |
124.5 |
-86.48 |
134.8 |
-31 |
0.00 |
|
|
Base exision repair (BER) |
1 |
48.43 |
16.3 |
46.61 |
14.5 |
-1.82 |
21.8 |
-4 |
0.69 |
|
2 |
52.54 |
13.8 |
49.11 |
15.1 |
-3.43 |
20.5 |
-7 |
0.43 |
|
|
Nucleotide excision repair (NER)2 |
1 |
39.38 |
21.3 |
38.13 |
23.9 |
-1.25 |
32.0 |
-3 |
0.85 |
|
2 |
37.71 |
18.8 |
35.50 |
23.3 |
-2.21 |
29.9 |
-6 |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
SEM: standard error of the mean. 1Based on samples exclusively from the second intervention period (n = 12). 2n = 23. |
|||||||||
|
Brevik et al. Nutrition Journal 2011 10:54 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-54 |
|||||||||
