Table 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comparison of the edible seed glycodecoy inhibitory activities to those of animal embryo-protecting and neonate-protecting substances |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Preparation and test |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
HM |
CM |
QEW |
RJ |
Honey |
Pumpkin |
Tomato |
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lectin |
HAI |
Wb |
HAI |
Wb |
HAI |
Wb |
HAI |
Wb |
HAI |
Wb |
HAI |
Wb |
HAI |
Wb |
||||||
|
N |
D |
Bn |
N |
D |
Bn |
D |
Bn |
N |
D |
Bn |
N |
D |
Bn |
N |
D |
Bn |
N |
D |
Bn |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
PA-IL |
8 |
6.5 |
5 |
1 |
<1 |
0 |
<1 |
0 |
6 |
<1 |
3 |
5 |
<1 |
1w |
7 |
3 |
4 |
9 |
4 |
vw |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
PA-IIL |
13 |
10 |
20 |
<1 |
<1 |
1 |
9 |
>5 |
16 |
14 |
10 |
16.5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
CV-IIL |
8 |
6 |
>15 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
13 |
>5 |
11 |
10 |
3 |
8 |
3.5 |
2 |
1 |
0.5 |
4 |
1.5 |
0.5 |
6 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
The lectin-inhibiting activities are expressed in numbers representing the hemagglutination titer reduction (Log2 dilution-1) of the three patholectins by non-dialyzed (N) and dialyzed (D) preparations of pumpkin seed and tomato seed extracts, as compared to animal embryo-protecting and neonate-protecting substances (human milk (HM), cow milk (CM), quail egg white (QEW), royal jelly (RJ), and honey [16]). The data include the results of hemagglutination inhibition tests (HAI) and counts of the observed GP bands (Bn) in these lectin-stained western blots (Wb), excluding the very weak (vw) ones. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rachmaninov et al. Nutrition Journal 2012 11:10 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-11-10 |
||||||||||||||||||||
