Table 3

Weight loss during low-calorie diet (n = 32) and further follow-up until program end (n = 9)
WL after LCD [kg] RWL after LCD [%] WL 12 at program end [kg] RWL at program end [%]
LCD intervention group (n = 32) 19.5 ± 5.65 16.2 ± 3.24
LCD intervention subgroupa (n = 9) 21.8 ± 8.41 17.0 ± 4.12 19.9 ± 15.0 15.5 ± 10.6

afollow-up until program end.

Abbreviations: WL Weight loss, RWL Relative weight loss.

Damms-Machado et al.

Damms-Machado et al. Nutrition Journal 2012 11:34   doi:10.1186/1475-2891-11-34

Open Data