Open Access Short report

Validity of self-reported lunch recalls in Swedish school children aged 6–8 years

Monica Hunsberger1*, Pablo Pena1, Lauren Lissner1, Lisen Grafström2, Barbara Vanaelst3, Claudia Börnhorst4, Valeria Pala5 and Gabriele Eiben1

Author affiliations

1 Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Box 454, Gothenburg 40530, Sweden

2 Grafströms Mat & Medicin HB, Gottskärsvägen 176 A, Onsala 43994, Sweden

3 Department of Public Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 2 block A, Ghent 9000, Belgium

4 Department of Statistical Methods in Epidemiology, Leibniz-Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS GmbH, Bremen, Germany

5 Epidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Venezian, 1, Milano 20133, Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

Nutrition Journal 2013, 12:129  doi:10.1186/1475-2891-12-129

Published: 18 September 2013

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have suggested that young children are inaccurate reporters of dietary intake. The purpose of this study was to validate a single recall of the previous day’s school lunch reported by 6–8 year old Swedish children and to assess teacher-recorded intake of the same meal in a standardized food journal. An additional research question was whether parents could report their child’s intake of the previous day’s lunch. Subjects constituted a convenience sample from the large, multi-country study Identification and prevention of Dietary- and lifestyle-induced health EFfects In Children and infantS (IDEFICS). Validations of both children’s recalls and teachers’ records were made by comparing results with the duplicate plate reference method.

Findings

Twenty-five children (12 boys/13 girls) aged 6–8 years participated in the validation study at one school in western Sweden. Children were accurate self-reporters of their dietary intake at lunch, with no significant difference between reported and weighed intake (Mean difference (SD): 7(50) kcals, p=0.49). Teachers significantly over-reported intake (Mean difference (SD): 65(79) kcals, p=0.01). For both methods, child-reported and teacher-recorded, correlations with weighed intake were strong (Pearson’s correlations r=0.92, p<0.001 and r=0.83, p<0.001 respectively). Bland-Altman plots showed strong agreement between child-reported and weighed intakes but confirmed systematic differences between teacher-records and weighed intakes. Foods were recalled by children with a food-match rate of 90%. In all cases parents themselves were unable to report on quantities consumed and only four of 25 children had parents with knowledge regarding food items consumed.

Conclusions

Children 6–8 years of age accurately recalled their school lunch intake for one occasion while teachers recorded with less accuracy. Our findings suggest that children as young as six years of age may be better able to report on their dietary intake than previously suggested, at least for one main meal at school. Teacher-recorded intake provides a satisfactory estimate but with greater systematic deviation from the weighed intake. Parents were not able to report on their children’s school lunches consumed on the previous day.

Keywords:
Dietary intake; 24-hour recall; Child reported dietary intake; Relative validation