Table 1

Breast Cancer and Omega 3:6 Ratio.

Reference
# of cases w/ breast cancer
# of controls
Post / pre Menopausal
Measure of n-3 / n-6 fat
Outcome
Odds ratio (95% Confidence Interval)

[183]
565
554 (population and hospital)
Pre & post
Diet FFQ
↑N3/N6 ratio in premenopausal women = Non-signif. ↓Breast cancer risk
0.59 (0.29–1.19)





In study site with population controls, find ↑N3/N6 ratio = Signif ↓Breast Cancer risk
0.50 (0.27, 0.95)
[184]
EURAMIC study
Nested case-control study in population study
Post
Adipose tissue
4 out of 5 centers showed ↑N3/N6 ratio = ↓Breast Cancer risk
0.65 (p for trend = 0.55)
[185]
241
88 w/ benign breast disease
Both
Adipose tissue
↑DHA = ↓Breast cancer
0.31 (0.13–0.75)





↑Ratio of long chain N-3:N-6 fat = ↓Breast cancer
0.33 (0.17–0.66)
[186]
73
74 w/ macromastia
?
Adipose tissue
N-6 fat content signif. higher in cases
P = 0.02





For given level of N-6 fat, EPA and DHA had a protective effect
P = 0.06
[187]
71 (within ORDET study)
142 (nested case control)
Post
RBC membranes
↑DHA = ↓Breast cancer
0.44 (0.21–0.92)
[67]
380
397
Post
Adipose tissue
No associations between N-3:N-6 ratio and breast cancer

[188]
314 (within Singapore Chinese Health study)


Diet, FFQ
↑Intake of N-3 fat from fish / shellfish = ↓Breast cancer, for all 3 highest quartiles
0.74 (0.58–0.94)





Among women in lowest quartile of N-3 fat intake, ↑N-6 fat intake = ↓Breast cancer
1.87 (1.06–3.27)

Donaldson Nutrition Journal 2004 3:19   doi:10.1186/1475-2891-3-19

Open Data