Table 2 |
|||||||||
|
Distribution of body composition parameters by previous contraceptive method |
|||||||||
|
Body weight, kg |
R/H, Ohm/m |
Xc/H, Ohm/m |
TBW, L |
||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Visit |
n |
M |
SD |
M |
SD |
M |
SD |
M |
SD |
|
|
|||||||||
|
T0/CM = 1 |
92 |
57.3 |
8.1 |
380.9 |
52.5 |
40.2 |
6.7 |
29.8 |
3.5 |
|
T0/CM = 2 |
40 |
59.4 |
8.4 |
373.0 |
45.7 |
39.0 |
7.1 |
30.8 |
3.4 |
|
T0/CM = 3 |
41 |
59.2 |
8.1 |
356.8 |
62.8 |
39.8 |
5.9 |
31.7 |
4.1 |
|
P(ANOVA) |
ns |
ns |
ns |
0.02 |
|||||
|
T1/CM = 1 |
89 |
57.8 |
8.2 |
376.4 |
51.5 |
40.6 |
5.7 |
30.1 |
3.8 |
|
T1/CM = 2 |
40 |
59.2 |
8.4 |
373.4 |
47.0 |
39.5 |
6.4 |
30.8 |
3.5 |
|
T1/CM = 3 |
41 |
59.4 |
8.0 |
354.8 |
67.5 |
39.5 |
5.4 |
32.0 |
4.6 |
|
P(ANOVA) |
ns |
ns |
ns |
0.04 |
|||||
|
T1-T0/CM = 1 |
89 |
0.40 |
1.42 |
-2.48 |
26.6 |
0.50 |
5.4 |
0.21 |
1.58 |
|
T1-T0/CM = 2 |
40 |
-0.18 |
1.12 |
0.42 |
31.6 |
0.43 |
5.2 |
-0.02 |
1.56 |
|
T1-T0/CM = 3 |
41 |
0.28 |
1.19 |
-2.06 |
19.5 |
-0.27 |
4.4 |
0.29 |
1.37 |
|
P(ANOVA) |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
|||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
CM = previous contraceptive method: 1 none, 2 oral contraceptive, 3 barrier method ANOVA = Analysis of variance T0, T1 = screening visit, after 1 month T1-T0 = change in parameters after 1 month |
|||||||||
|
Piccoli et al. Nutrition Journal 2008 7:21 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-7-21 |
|||||||||
