Table 2 |
||
|
The mobile phases studied. |
||
|
No |
Solvents |
Proportions (v/v) |
|
|
||
|
1 |
toluene – ethyl acetate – formic acid (98–100%) |
36 : 12 : 5 |
|
2 |
cyclohexane – ethyl acetate – formic acid (98–100%) |
30 : 15 : 5 |
|
3 |
toluene – ethyl acetate – glacial acetic acid |
36 : 12 : 5 |
|
4 |
cyclohexane – ethyl acetate – glacial acetic acid |
31 : 14 : 5 |
|
5 |
n-hexane – ethyl acetate – formic acid (98–100%) |
31 : 14 : 5 |
|
6 |
toluene – acetone – formic acid (98–100%) |
38 : 10 : 5 |
|
7 |
n-hexane-ethyl acetate – glacial acetic acid |
31 : 14 : 5 |
|
8 |
petroleum ether (40–70°C) – ethyl acetate – formic acid (98–100%) |
30 : 15 : 5 |
|
9 |
carbon tetrachloride – acetone – formic acid (98–100%) |
35 : 10 : 5 |
|
10 |
n-hexane – ethyl acetate – glacial acetic acid |
30 : 20 : 1.5 |
|
11 |
chloroform – methanol – formic acid (98–100%) |
44 : 3.5 : 2. 5 |
|
|
||
|
Medić-Šarić et al. Nutrition Journal 2009 8:33 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-33 |
||