Table 4 |
|
|
Results of validation of HPTLC method [19]. |
|
|
Validation data |
Value |
|
|
|
|
linearity |
r > 0.99 |
|
precision |
|
|
repeatability of the sample application and intra-day precision |
RSD < 3.8% |
|
repeatability of peak-area measurement |
RSD < 2.4% |
|
accuracy |
RSD < 6.5% |
|
limit of detection |
PME 7.5 ng/band IFA 7.5 ng/band CA 60 ng/band |
|
limit of quantification |
PME 22.5 ng/band IFA 22.5 ng/band CA 180 ng/band |
|
robustness |
|
|
inter-day precision and stability of standard solutions |
RSD < 5% (two days) |
|
stability on the plate |
RSD < 3.4% (up to 2 hours)* |
|
effect of temperature |
RSD < 4.6% (20/26°C) |
|
selectivity |
absorption spectra matching > 0.99 |
|
|
|
|
*only caffeic acid degraded up to 9.4% in 120 minutes, but as the analysis lasts less, this was not of great significance; CA: caffeic acid; IFA: isoferulic acid; PME: pinocembrin-7-methylether; RSD: relative standard deviation. |
|
|
Medić-Šarić et al. Nutrition Journal 2009 8:33 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-33 |
|