Table 3 |
||||
|
association between the "snacking" score and the "modern foods" score and overweight and overfatness (a) |
||||
|
N |
"snacking" score |
"modern foods" score |
||
|
|
||||
|
OR(b) for overweight |
unadjusted |
1060 |
1.01 [0.94-1.09] (p = 0.703) |
1.19 [1.08-1.32] (p <0.001) |
|
adjusted(c) |
867 |
1.04 [0.95-1.13] (p = 0.424) |
1.19 [1.03-1.36] (p = 0.018) |
|
|
|
||||
|
OR(b) for overfatness |
unadjusted |
1060 |
1.03 [0.96-1.10] (p = 0.340) |
1.11 [1.02-1.22] (p = 0.015) |
|
adjusted(c) |
911 |
1.03 [0.95-1.12] (p = 0.483) |
1.14 [1.00-1.29] (p = 0.044) |
|
|
|
||||
|
(a) multiple logistic regression model (b) OR: Odds Ratio associated with an increase of one point of the score (c) adjusted for the following variables: age, gender, physical activity, ethnicity, rural/urban place of birth, marital status, economic level, professional occupation, schooling and district. The interaction score*gender was not included in the final model because it was not significant |
||||
|
Becquey et al. Nutrition Journal 2010 9:13 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-13 |
||||