Table 3 |
|||
|
Summary and Formula Comparisons of Weight Gain (g/day) at Week 16 |
|||
|
Gold |
Gold + Lutein |
Total |
|
|
(n = 110) |
(n = 110) |
(n = 220) |
|
|
|
|||
|
Summary Statistics |
|||
|
n |
110 |
110 |
220 |
|
mean |
28.48 |
29.04 |
28.76 |
|
std |
5.371 |
5.030 |
5.199 |
|
median |
27.78 |
28.30 |
28.17 |
|
min |
16.9 |
19.6 |
16.9 |
|
max |
49.9 |
47.3 |
49.9 |
|
Model Estimate* |
|||
|
n |
110 |
110 |
- |
|
LS Mean |
28.41 |
29.19 |
- |
|
Standard Error |
0.455 |
0.455 |
- |
|
90% Confidence Interval |
(27.23, 29.59) |
(28.01, 30.37) |
- |
|
The Estimated Treatment Difference* |
|||
|
Gold + Lutein VS. |
0.781 |
- |
- |
|
90% Confidence Interval for the Estimated Treatment Difference* |
|||
|
Gold + Lutein VS. |
(-0.91, 2.47) |
- |
- |
|
|
|||
|
Population: Per Protocol = ITT for this parameter * Estimates created from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fixed effects treatment, gender, age (in days), age at the Week 16 measurement (in days) and baseline weight-for-length z-score. The numbers of subjects with valid measurements in the PP (Per-Protocol) and the ITT (Intention-to-Treat) populations are the same. |
|||
|
Capeding et al. Nutrition Journal 2010 9:22 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-22 |
|||
