Table 2 |
|||||
|
Effect of age, gender, folate and vitamin B12 on lipoprotein levels |
|||||
|
triglycerides |
HDL-C |
LDL-C |
LDL-C/HDL-C |
total cholesterol |
|
|
|
|||||
|
n |
1468 |
593 |
593 |
592 |
123 |
|
|
|||||
|
Folate |
Beta = -0.045; p = 0.087 |
Beta = 0.094; p = 0.021 |
Beta = -0.164; p < 0.001 |
Beta = -0.210; p < 0.001 |
Beta = -0.138; p = 0.147 |
|
|
|||||
|
Vitamin B12 |
Beta = -0.051; p = 0.052 |
Beta = 0.030 p = 0.458 |
Beta = 0.070; p = 0.094 |
Beta = 0.058; p = 0.164 |
Beta = -0.151; p = 0.110 |
|
|
|||||
|
Age (year) |
Beta = 0.125; p < 0.001 |
Beta = -0.012; p = 0.762 |
Beta = 0.254; p < 0.001 |
Beta = 0.160; p < 0.001 |
Beta = 0.178; p = 0.054 |
|
|
|||||
|
Gender (male) |
Beta = 0.211; p < 0.001 |
Beta = -0.352; p < 0.001 |
Beta = -0.082; p = 0.045 |
Beta = 0.186; p < 0.001 |
Beta = -0.180; p = 0.052 |
|
|
|||||
|
Linear logistic regression analysis (standardized partial regression coefficient Beta and p-value) of the independent predictive character of the covariables age, gender, plasma folate level, and plasma vitamin B12 level for the dependent variables triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C-ratio and total cholesterol levels are depicted. As these were five separate analyses, we set the level of significance to alpha = 0.01 |
|||||
|
Semmler et al. Nutrition Journal 2010 9:31 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-31 |
|||||