Table 4 |
|||||||||
|
Result at the health check up among Previously Healthy Adequate Reporters (the Västerbotten Intervention Program 1992-2005).1 |
|||||||||
|
Sex |
Women |
Men |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Food pattern group (FPG) (n) |
Total (9,376) |
High fat (3,398) |
Tea & ice cream (3,122) |
Coffe & sandwich (2,100) |
Fruit & vegetables (756) |
Total (8,691) |
High fat (1,790) |
Tea, soda, & cookies (4,726) |
Fruit & vegetables (2,175) |
|
|
|||||||||
|
Diagnoses at health checkup (%) |
|||||||||
|
Elevated S-lipid levels |
18.1 |
19.6 |
16.4 |
18.7 |
17.3 |
22.8 |
25.7 |
22.8 |
20.6 |
|
Elevated blood pressure |
9.2 |
9.1 |
7.8 |
10.5 |
11.8 |
15.9 |
16.1 |
15.6 |
16.4 |
|
Diabetes |
1.3 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
|
IGT |
4.7 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
3.3 |
2.4 |
3.7 |
3.2 |
|
IFG |
7.3 |
8.0 |
6.6 |
7.0 |
7.2 |
10.8 |
11.4 |
10.5 |
10.9 |
|
Perceived health (%) |
|||||||||
|
bad/relatively bad |
6.6 |
6.6 |
7.4 |
5.8 |
6.2 |
4.7 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
4.0 |
|
fair |
20.1 |
20.6 |
20.2 |
20.0 |
19.4 |
19.9 |
22.4 |
19.5 |
19.1 |
|
relatively good |
47.2 |
47.8 |
46.9 |
48.6 |
45.5 |
49.9 |
49.0 |
50.7 |
49.6 |
|
good |
25.5 |
25.0 |
25.5 |
25.7 |
28.9 |
25.1 |
23.6 |
24.9 |
27.3 |
|
|
|||||||||
|
Abbreviations: IGT = Impaired Glucose Tolerance; IFG = Impaired Fasting Glucose 1ANOVA and Chi-square test used to test differences between sexes and among FPGs within sex. All differences between sexes significant at P < 0.001. Among female FPGs differences in "S-lipid levels" and "Blood pressure" are significant at P < 0.01; remaining differences non-significant ("Diabetes" P = 0.55, "IGT" P = 0.97, "IFG" P = 0.17, "Perceived health" P = 0.17). Among male FPGs differences in "S-lipid levels" and "Perceived health" are significant at P < 0.01, "IGT" P = 0.03; remaining differences non-significant ("Blood pressure" P = 0.65, "Diabetes" P = 0.54, and "IFG" P = 0.49). |
|||||||||
|
Hörnell et al. Nutrition Journal 2010 9:48 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-48 |
|||||||||
