<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Nutrition Journal - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Nutrition Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2009-07-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/30" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/29" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/28" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/27" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/26" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/21" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/30">
        <title>A newly developed snack effective for enhancing bone volume</title>
        <description>Background:
The incidence of primary osteoporosis is higher in Japan than in USA and European countries. Recently, the importance of preventive medicine has been gradually recognized in the field of orthopaedic surgery with a concept that peak bone mass should be increased in childhood as much as possible for the prevention of osteoporosis. Under such background, we have developed a new bean snack with an aim to improve bone volume loss. In this study, we examined the effects of a newly developed snack on bone volume and density in osteoporosis model mice.
Methods:
Orchiectomy (ORX) and ovariectomy (OVX) were performed for C57BL/6J mice of twelve-week-old (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbar, ME, USA) were used in this experiment. We prepared and given three types of powder diet e.g.: normal calcium diet (NCD, Ca : 0.9%, Clea Japan Co., Tokyo, Japan), low calcium diet (LCD, Ca : 0.63%, Clea Japan Co.,) and special diet (SCD, Ca : 0.9%). Eighteen weeks after surgery, all the animals were sacrified and prepared for histomorphometric analysis to quantify bone density and bone mineral content
Results:
As a result of histomorphometric examination, SCD was revealed to enhance bone volume irrespective of age and sex. The bone density was increased significantly in osteoporosis model mice fed the newly developmental snack as compared with the control mice. The bone mineral content was also enhanced significantly. These phenomena were revealed in both sexes.
Conclusions:
It is shown that the newly developed bean snack is highly effective for the improvement of bone volume loss irrespective of sex. We demonstrated that newly developmental snack supplements may be a useful preventive measure for Japanese whose bone mineral density values are less than the ideal condition.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/30</link>
                <dc:creator>Junji Ohtani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rene Arturo Marquez Hernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hiroko Sunagawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tadashi Fujita</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toshitsugu Kawata</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masato Kaku</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masahide Motokawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Natsumi Tsuka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hiroyuki Koseki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yayoi Matsuda</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hidetaka Hayashi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sara Abedini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kazuo Tanne</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:30</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-30</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/29">
        <title>Physicians and nurses use and recommend dietary supplements: report of a survey</title>
        <description>Background:
Numerous surveys show that dietary supplements are used by a large proportion of the general public, but there have been relatively few surveys on the prevalence of dietary supplement use among health professionals, including physicians and nurses.  Even less information is available regarding the extent to which physicians and nurses recommend dietary supplements to their patients.
Methods:
An online survey was administered in October 2007 to 900 physicians and 277 nurses by Ipsos Public Affairs for the Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), a trade association representing the dietary supplement industry.  The health professionals were asked whether they used dietary supplements and their reasons for doing so, and whether they recommend dietary supplements to their patients.
Results:
The &quot;Life...supplemented&quot; Healthcare Professionals Impact Study (HCP Impact Study) found that 72% of physicians and 89% of nurses in this sample used dietary supplements regularly, occasionally, or seasonally.  Regular use of dietary supplements was reported by 51% of physicians and 59% of nurses.  The most common reason given for using dietary supplements was for overall health and wellness (40% of physicians and 48% of nurses), but more than two-thirds cited more than one reason for using the products.  When asked whether they &quot;ever recommend dietary supplements&quot; to their patients, 79% of physicians and 82% of nurses said they did.
Conclusions:
Physicians and nurses are as likely as members of the general public to use dietary supplements, as shown by comparing the results of this survey with data from national health and nutrition surveys.  Also, most physicians and nurses recommend supplements to their patients, whether or not the clinicians use dietary supplements themselves.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/29</link>
                <dc:creator>Annette Dickinson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nicolas Boyon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Shao</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:29</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-29</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/28">
        <title>Assessing the internal validity of a household survey-based 
food security measure adapted for use in Iran

</title>
        <description>Background:
The prevalence of food insecurity is an indicator of material well-being in an area of basic need. The U.S. Food Security Module has been adapted for use in a wide variety of cultural and linguistic settings around the world. We assessed the internal validity of the adapted U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module to measure adult and child food insecurity in Isfahan, Iran, using statistical methods based on the Rasch measurement model.
Methods:
The U.S. Household Food Security Survey Module was translated into Farsi and after adaptation, administered to a representative sample. Data were provided by 2,004 randomly selected households from all sectors of the population of Isfahan, Iran, during 2005.
Results:
53.1 percent reported that their food had run out at some time during the previous 12 months and they did not have money to buy more, while 26.7 percent reported that an adult had cut the size of a meal or skipped a meal because there was not enough money for food, and 7.2 percent reported that an adult did not eat for a whole day because there was not enough money for food. The severity of the items in the adult scale, estimated under Rasch-model assumptions, covered a range of 6.65 logistic units, and those in the child scale 11.68 logistic units. Most Item-infit statistics were near unity, and none exceeded 1.20.
Conclusion:
The range of severity of items provides measurement coverage across a wide range of severity of food insecurity for both adults and children. Both scales demonstrated acceptable levels of internal validity, although several items should be improved. The similarity of the response patterns in the Isfahan and the U.S. suggests that food insecurity is experienced, managed, and described similarly in the two countries.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/28</link>
                <dc:creator>Morteza Rafiei</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Nord</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Atefeh Sadeghizadeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohammad Entezari</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:28</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-28</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>28</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/27">
        <title>Tolerance of a standard intact protein formula versus a partially hydrolyzed formula in healthy, term infants</title>
        <description>Background:
Parents who perceive common infant behaviors as formula intolerance-related often switch formulas without consulting a health professional.  Up to one-half of formula-fed infants experience a formula change during the first six months of life.
Methods:
The objective of this study was to assess discontinuance due to study physician-assessed formula intolerance in healthy, term infants.  Infants (335) were randomized to receive either a standard intact cow milk protein formula (INTACT) or a partially hydrolyzed cow milk protein formula (PH) in a 60 day non-inferiority trial.   Discontinuance due to study physician-assessed formula intolerance was the primary outcome.  Secondary outcomes included number of infants who discontinued for any reason, including parent-assessed.
Results:
Formula intolerance between groups (INTACT, 12.3% vs. PH, 13.7%) was similar for infants who completed the study or discontinued due to study physician-assessed formula intolerance.  Overall study discontinuance based on parent- vs. study physician-assessed intolerance for all infants (14.4 vs.11.1%) was significantly different (P = 0.001).
Conclusion:
This study demonstrated no difference in infant tolerance of intact vs. partially hydrolyzed cow milk protein formulas for healthy, term infants over a 60-day feeding trial, suggesting nonstandard partially hydrolyzed formulas are not necessary as a first-choice for healthy infants.   Parents frequently perceived infant behavior as formula intolerance, paralleling previous reports of unnecessary formula changes.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov: NCT00666120</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/27</link>
                <dc:creator>Carol Berseth</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Mitmesser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ekhard Ziegler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Marunycz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jon Vanderhoof</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:27</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-27</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/26">
        <title>Effect of commercial rye whole-meal bread on postprandial blood glucose and gastric emptying in healthy subjects</title>
        <description>Background:
The intake of dietary fibre has been shown to reduce the risk of developing diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of commercial rye whole-meal bread containing whole kernels and white wheat bread on the rate of gastric emptying and postprandial glucose response in healthy subjects.
Methods:
Ten healthy subjects took part in a blinded crossover trial. Blood glucose level and gastric emptying rate (GER) were determined after the ingestion of 150 g white wheat bread or 150 g whole-meal rye bread on two different occasions after fasting overnight. The GER was measured using real-time ultrasonography, and was calculated as the percentage change in antral cross-sectional area 15 and 90 minutes after completing the meal.
Results:
No statistically significant difference was found between the GER values or the blood glucose levels following the two meals when evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test.
Conclusion:
The present study revealed no difference in postprandial blood glucose response or gastric emptying after the ingestion of rye whole-meal bread compared with white wheat bread.Trial registrationNCT00779298</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/26</link>
                <dc:creator>Joanna Hlebowicz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jenny Maria Jonsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sandra Lindstedt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ola Bjorgell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gassan Darwiche</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lars-Olof Almer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:26</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-26</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>26</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/25">
        <title>Effect of octanoic acid-rich formula on plasma ghrelin levels in cachectic patients with chronic respiratory disease</title>
        <description>Background:
For cachectic patients with chronic respiratory disease (CRD), conventional enteral nutrition formula is an optional treatment to maintain energy balance.  The molecular mechanisms by which enteral nutrition formula controls appetite and weight remain unknown. We examined whether enteral nutrition formula rich in octanoic acids would increase plasma levels of ghrelin, an appetite-stimulating hormone produced in the stomach, in cachectic patients with CRD.
Methods:
Plasma ghrelin profiles in cachectic patients with CRD were assessed and compared with those in age- and sex-matched controls.  Plasma levels of acyl-ghrelin, an active ghrelin modified by octanoic acids, and desacyl-ghrelin were measured separately.  We examined changes in 24-h plasma ghrelin profiles before and after single administration of the formula.  We also evaluated the effects of 2-week administration of the formula on plasma ghrelin levels and nutritional status in patients.
Results:
The ratio of acyl-ghrelin to desacyl-ghrelin in plasma was lower in patients than in controls.  Single administration of the formula did not change plasma desacyl-ghrelin levels, but induced an increase in acyl-ghrelin levels.  Two-week treatment with the formula was effective in increasing weight and acyl-ghrelin, along with improving nutritional status in patients.
Conclusion:
These results show that the formula contributes to increased weight, which may be associated with induction of acyl-ghrelin production in cachectic patients with CRD.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Jun-ichi Ashitani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nobuhiro Matsumoto</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Masamitsu Nakazato</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-25</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/24">
        <title>Comparison of enteral nutrition with combined enteral and parenteral nutrition in post-pancreaticoduodenectomy patients: a pilot study</title>
        <description>Background:
Many clinical studies have demonstrated that early postoperative enteral nutrition (EN) improved the postroperative course. Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), patients tend to suffer from postoperative nausea, abdominal distention, and diarrhoea, causing difficulty in the introduction of EN. In this pilot study, we investigated the appropriate nutritional mode post-pancreatic surgery.
Methods:
Between October 2006 and March 2007 2 postoperative nutritional methods were implemented in 17 patients in a prospective single-centere study. Eight patients received only enteral nutrition (EN group) and 9 patients received enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition (EN + PN group).
Results:
There were no differences in the patient characteristics and postoperative morbidity between the 2 groups. The rate of discontinuance of enteral feeding was significantly high in the EN group, and the duration of enteral feeding was significantly longer in the EN + PN group. The central venous line was retained for a significantly longer period in the EN + PN group, but there was no difference in the frequency of catheter-related infection between the 2 groups.
Conclusion:
EN combined with PN is more adequate for patients after pancreatic surgery.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Shigeyuki Nagata</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kengo Fukuzawa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yukio Iwashita</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Akira Kabashima</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tadahiko Kinoshita</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kenzo Wakasugi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yoshihiko Maehara</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-24</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/23">
        <title>Effect of a supplement rich in alkaline minerals on acid-base balance in humans</title>
        <description>Background:
Western diets are considered acidogenic due to the high dietary acid load and a low intake of base-forming dietary minerals such as potassium, magnesium or calcium. In the present study we investigated the effect of a multimineral supplement (MMS) rich in alkaline minerals on acute and chronic regulation of acid-base balance with the pH of blood, urine and saliva as potential surrogate markers.
Methods:
Parameters were measured (i) without MMS intake, (ii) in the three consecutive hours following ingestion (blood and urinary pH) and (iii) during one week with or without MMS intake (self-monitored using pH measurement strips).
Results:
25 (15 female; 10 male) subjects (age 44 &#177; 14 y; BMI 23.9 &#177; 1.9 kg/m2) were enrolled in the investigation. Following acute administration of the MMS in the morning, blood ph (1 and 2 h after ingestion) rose from 7.40 to 7.41; p &lt; 0.05, and also urinary pH 3 h after ingestion (5.94 to 6.57; p &lt; 0.05) increased significantly.Following longer-term supplementation, both the increase in urinary pH in the morning and in the evening occurred within 1 day. Compared to pH values without the MMS, average pH in urine was 11% higher in the morning and 5% higher in the evening. Analyses of food records showed that the increase in urinary pH was not related to dietary change.
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that the ingestion of a multimineral supplement is associated with both a significant increase in blood and urinary pH. The health related consequences of this supplementation remain to be determined.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Konig</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Klaus Muser</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Herrmann Dickhuth</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Aloys Berg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Deibert</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-23</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/22">
        <title>Indices of insulin sensitivity and secretion from a standard liquid meal test in subjects with type 2 diabetes, impaired or normal fasting glucose</title>
        <description>Background:
To provide an initial evaluation of insulin sensitivity and secretion indices derived from a standard liquid meal tolerance test protocol in subjects with normal (NFG), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods:
Areas under the curve (AUC) for glucose, insulin and C-peptide from pre-meal to 120 min after consumption of a liquid meal were calculated, as were homeostasis model assessments of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) and the Matsuda index of insulin sensitivity.
Results:
Subjects with NFG (n = 19), IFG (n = 19), and diabetes (n = 35) had mean &#177; SEM HOMA2-IR values of 1.0 &#177; 0.1, 1.6 &#177; 0.2 and 2.5 &#177; 0.3 and Matsuda insulin sensitivity index values of 15.6 &#177; 2.0, 8.8 &#177; 1.2 and 6.0 &#177; 0.6, respectively. The log-transformed values for these variables were highly correlated overall and within each fasting glucose category (r = -0.91 to -0.94, all p &lt; 0.001). Values for the product of the insulin/glucose AUC ratio and the Matsuda index, an indicator of the ability of the pancreas to match insulin secretion to the degree of insulin resistance, were 995.6 &#177; 80.7 (NFG), 684.0 &#177; 57.3 (IFG) and 188.3 &#177; 16.1 (diabetes) and discriminated significantly between fasting glucose categories (p &lt; 0.001 for each comparison).
Conclusion:
These results provide initial evidence to support the usefulness of a standard liquid meal tolerance test for evaluation of insulin secretion and sensitivity in clinical and population studies.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Kevin Maki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James McKenney</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mildred Farmer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Reeves</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Dicklin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-22</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/21">
        <title>Stroke and plasma markers of milk fat intake - a prospective nested case-control study</title>
        <description>Background:
Dairy products are high in saturated fat and are traditionally a risk factor for vascular diseases. The fatty acids 15:0 and 17:0 of plasma lipids are biomarkers of milk fat intake. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk of a first-ever stroke in relation to the plasma milk fat biomarkers.
Methods:
A prospective case-control study was nested within two population based health surveys in Northern Sweden. Among 129 stroke cases and 257 matched controls, plasma samples for fatty acid analyses were available in 108 cases and 216 control subjects. Proportions of 15:0 and 17:0 of plasma lipids, weight, height, blood lipids, blood pressures, and lifestyle data were employed in conditional logistic regression modelling.
Results:
The proportions of fatty acids 17:0 and 15:0+17:0 of total plasma phospholipids were significantly higher in female controls than cases, but not in men. 17:0 and 15:0+17:0 were significantly and inversely related to stroke in the whole study sample as well as in women. The standardised odds ratio (95% CI) in women to have a stroke was 0.41 (0.24&#8211;0.69) for 17:0 in plasma phospholipids. Adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity and diet had marginal effects on the odds ratios. A similar, but non-significant, trend was seen in men.
Conclusion:
It is hypothesised that dairy or milk fat intake may be inversely related to the risk of a first event of stroke. The intriguing results of this study should be interpreted with caution. Follow up studies with greater power, and where intakes are monitored both by dietary recordings and fatty acid markers are needed.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Eva Warensjo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Annika Smedman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Birgitta Stegmayr</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Goran Hallmans</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lars Weinehall</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bengt Vessby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingegerd Johansson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-21</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
