Table 2 |
||||
|
Mean total energy, and total protein, animal and plant protein intakes and their contribution to the energy intakes (n = 661) |
||||
|
Intakea |
Total |
Boys |
Girls |
Pb |
|
|
||||
|
Total energy intake (kcal/d) |
Mean ± SD |
|||
|
2.5-4 y |
1408.4 ± 260.4 |
1441.7 ± 253.0 |
1372.7 ± 264.9 |
0.045 |
|
4-6.5 y |
1474.4 ± 240.0* |
1526.3 ± 233.7** |
1420.8 ± 235.1 |
<0.001 |
|
Total protein (g/d) |
||||
|
2.5-4 y |
54.8 ± 11.8 |
55.2 ± 10.5 |
54.3 ± 13.0 |
0.405 |
|
4-6.5 y |
56.4 ± 10.7 |
58.1 ± 10.3** |
54.6 ± 10.9 |
<0.001 |
|
Total protein (g/(kg.d)) |
||||
|
2.5-4 y |
3.7 ± 0.9 |
3.7 ± 0.8 |
3.7 ± 0.9 |
0.400 |
|
4-6.5 y |
3.1 ± 0.8* |
3.2 ± 0.7* |
3.0 ± 0.8* |
0.002 |
|
Animal protein (g/d) |
||||
|
2.5-4 y |
37.7 ± 10.9 |
37.2 ± 9.9 |
38.3 ± 11.8 |
0.576 |
|
4-6.5 y |
38.8 ± 9.7 |
39.9 ± 9.6** |
37.7 ± 9.8 |
0.013 |
|
Plant protein (g/d) |
||||
|
2.5-4 y |
17.0 ± 4.8 |
18.0 ± 5.6 |
15.9 ± 3.6 |
0.002 |
|
4-6.5 y |
17.6 ± 4.4** |
18.3 ± 4.5 |
17.0 ± 4.2** |
0.001 |
|
Animal/plant protein ratio |
||||
|
2.5-4 y |
2.4 ± 0.8 |
2.2 ± 0.9 |
2.5 ± 0.9 |
0.025 |
|
4-6.5 y |
2.3 ± 0.8 |
2.3 ± 0.7 |
2.3 ± 0.8 |
0.533 |
|
Energy % ± SD |
||||
|
Total protein |
||||
|
2.5-4 y |
15.7 ± 2.1 |
15.5 ± 2.1 |
15.9 ± 2.0 |
0.235 |
|
4-6.5 y |
15.5 ± 2.1 |
15.4 ± 2.1 |
15.5 ± 2.0 |
0.642 |
|
Animal protein |
||||
|
2.5-4 y |
10.8 ± 2.4 |
10.4 ± 2.3 |
11.1 ± 2.4 |
0.043 |
|
4-6.5 y |
10.6 ± 2.3 |
10.6 ± 2.3 |
10.7 ± 2.3 |
0.699 |
|
Plant protein |
||||
|
2.5-4 y |
4.9 ± 1.2 |
5.1 ± 1.4 |
4.7 ± 0.9 |
0.050 |
|
4-6.5 y |
4.8 ± 0.9 |
4.8 ± 1.0 |
4.8 ± 0.8 |
0.971 |
|
|
||||
|
SD, standard deviation. aMean total, animal, and plant protein intakes were adjusted for within-person variability using the Multiple Source Method. bP value for mean differences between boys and girls (Student's t-test after log transformation) *Mean value was significantly different from 2.5-4 y old, P ≤ 0.001 (Student's t-test after log transformation). **Mean value was significantly different from 2.5-4 y old, P < 0.05 (Student's t-test after log transformation). |
||||
|
Lin et al. Nutrition Journal 2011 10:97 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-97 |
||||