Table 3 |
|||||
| Vitamin D supplementation by men and women aged 25–85 in selected health risk groups | |||||
| Number of Vitamin D Sources1 | |||||
| Unwtd | None | 1 Source | ≥ 2 Sources | ||
| N | Wtd. % | Wtd. % | Wtd. % | ||
| Obese(BMI ≥30)2 | |||||
| Women | |||||
| All | 2324 | 40.2 | 36.8 | 23.0 | |
| WhiteNH | 1463 | 34.4 | 38.9 | 26.7 | |
| Black | 290 | 47.4* | 39.4 | 12.9* | |
| Latino | 333 | 55.0* | 29.9 | 15.1* | |
| Men | |||||
| All | 1707 | 51.2 | 41.5 | 7.3 | |
| WhiteNH | 1164 | 47.9 | 44.9 | 7.1 | |
| Black | 131 | 49.0 | 41.4 | 9.5 | |
| Latino | 234 | 60.2* | 32.7 | 7.1 | |
| Diabetic2 | |||||
| Women | |||||
| All | 885 | 37.3 | 36.2 | 26.5 | |
| WhiteNH | 490 | 30.9 | 38.5 | 30.5 | |
| Black | 108 | 48.0* | 41.6 | 12.4* | |
| Latino | 121 | 54.1* | 27.5 | 18.4* | |
| Men | |||||
| All | 1125 | 49.4 | 41.2 | 9.4 | |
| WhiteNH | 685 | 45.3 | 44.0 | 10.6 | |
| Black | 96 | 50.4 | 36.1 | 13.5 | |
| Latino | 129 | 60.3* | 37.5 | 2.2* | |
| Hypertensive | |||||
| Women | |||||
| All | 3169 | 33.0 | 36.6 | 32.0 | |
| WhiteNH | 2094 | 28.8 | 35.8 | 35.3 | |
| Black | 316 | 39.4* | 44.0 | 16.6* | |
| Latino | 252 | 41.5* | 34.5 | 24.0* | |
| Filipino | 225 | 39.7* | 35.5 | 24.8* | |
| Chinese | 101 | 29.5 | 32.7 | 37.7 | |
| Men | |||||
| All | 3091 | 46.7 | 43.4 | 9.9 | |
| WhiteNH | 2099 | 43.9 | 46.0 | 10.1 | |
| Black | 241 | 47.1 | 44.3 | 8.6 | |
| Latino | 246 | 56.3* | 33.2 | 10.5 | |
| Filipino | 183 | 46.0 | 44.2 | 9.8 | |
| Chinese | 112 | 52.5 | 37.6 | 9.9 | |
Unwtd. N = Actual subgroup sample size. Wtd. % = Respondent data weighted to the age, gender, and geographic composition of the health plan membership at time of the survey.
1 Sources of vitamin D: Calcium with D, multivitamin, singular D, or D in another combination. At the time of the survey, each of these sources generally contained contained 400 IU of vitamin D2.
2 Numbers of Filipino and Chinese women and men in risk group too small to use for estimates.
* Differs significantly from White nonHispanics at p<.05.
Gordon et al. Nutrition Journal 2012 11:104 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-11-104