Table 6 |
||||||||
|
Mean intakes estimated from the 2nd DHQ across quintiles of intakes estimated from the 1st DHQ (n = 58) |
||||||||
|
1st DHQ |
Agreement (% classified into the same or adjacent quintile)1 |
Discordance (% classified into the opposite quintile)1 |
Linear trend2 p |
|||||
|
|
||||||||
|
1st quintile |
2nd quintile |
3rd quintile |
4th quintile |
5th quintile |
||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
Mean ± SD |
||||
|
|
||||||||
|
2nd DHQ |
||||||||
|
Energy [kcal/day] |
1452 ± 498 |
1786 ± 292 |
1591 ± 227 |
1908 ± 300 |
2120 ± 323 |
70.7 |
1.7 |
< 0.001 |
|
Folate [μg/day]3 |
185 ± 44 |
241 ± 37 |
243 ± 60 |
288 ± 63 |
447 ± 126 |
81.1 |
0 |
< 0.001 |
|
Vitamin B12 [μg/day]3 |
4.44 ± 2.32 |
5.03 ± 2.41 |
5.27 ± 1.51 |
6.16 ± 1.78 |
8.77 ± 4.36 |
77.6 |
1.7 |
< 0.001 |
|
|
||||||||
|
DHQ: self-administered diet history questionnaire 1Agreement and discordance in quintile ranking was assessed as the percentage classification for the pregnant women based on the two-time DHQ in the same, adjacent, and opposite quintiles 2Linear regression analyses were performed to test for significant linear trends between estimated intakes from the two-time DHQ 3Linear regression analyses were conducted after log-transformation of the variables |
||||||||
|
Shiraishi et al. Nutrition Journal 2012 11:15 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-11-15 |
||||||||