Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Nutrition Journal and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Short report

Cocoa intake and arterial stiffness in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors

José Ignacio Recio-Rodríguez1*, Manuel A Gómez-Marcos1, María C Patino-Alonso2, Cristina Agudo-Conde1, Emiliano Rodríguez-Sánchez1, Luis García-Ortiz1 and Vaso-Risk group

Author affiliations

1 Primary Care Research Unit, La Alamedilla Health Center, Avda. Comuneros 27, 37003 Salamanca, Spain

2 Statistics Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

Nutrition Journal 2012, 11:8  doi:10.1186/1475-2891-11-8

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.nutritionj.com/content/11/1/8


Received:1 August 2011
Accepted:10 February 2012
Published:10 February 2012

© 2012 Recio-Rodriguez et al; BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

To analyze the relationship of cocoa intake to central and peripheral blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and carotid intima-media thickness in subjects with some cardiovascular risk factor.

Findings

Design: A cross-sectional study of 351 subjects (mean age 54.76 years, 62.4% males). Measurements: Intake of cocoa and other foods using a food frequency questionnaire, central and peripheral (ambulatory and office) blood pressure, central and peripheral augmentation index, pulse wave velocity, ambulatory arterial stiffness index, carotid intima-media thickness, and ankle-brachial index.

Results: Higher pulse wave velocity and greater cardiovascular risk were found in non-cocoa consumers as compared to high consumers (p < 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, these differences disappeared after adjusting for age, gender, the presence of diabetes, systolic blood pressure and antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drug use. All other arterial stiffness measures (central and peripheral augmentation index, ambulatory arterial stiffness index, ankle-brachial index, and carotid intima-media thickness) showed no differences between the different consumption groups.

Conclusions

In subjects with some cardiovascular risk factors, cocoa consumption does not imply improvement in the arterial stiffness values.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01325064.

Keywords:
Cocoa; Atherosclerosis; Blood pressure

Introduction

Cocoa intake is related to a lower cardiovascular risk [1,2]. Although, two recently published metaanalyses coincide that it is unclear whether cocoa consumption is related to reductions in adverse cardiovascular outcomes [3,4].

The benefits of cocoa could be explained by an improved endothelial function and a beneficial effect on blood pressure [5], particularly in subjects with high levels of blood pressure [6]. However, the relationship of usual cocoa consumption to arterial stiffness parameters and central blood pressure is not clear [7,8], although cocoa intake has been related to a lower prevalence of atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries [9,10]. The relationship between cocoa consumption and arterial stiffness has only been studied in healthy individuals without cardiovascular risk factors.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship of cocoa intake to central and peripheral blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and carotid intima-media thickness in subjects with some cardiovascular risk factor.

Methods

A cross-sectional study conducted on 351 subjects in a primary care setting. Participants were recruited at primary care offices during 2010. Sample size was estimated to detect a minimum difference of 1 m/sec in pulse wave velocity (PWV) between two of the three groups in which sample was divided based on cocoa intake. Assuming an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2 in a two-sided test and a standard deviation of 2.1, 93 subjects per group were required, 279 in total. The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [11], and was approved by an independent ethics committee of Salamanca University Hospital (Spain). Written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all subjects.

Information about the frequency of cocoa intake and all other foods was collected using the food frequency questionnaire of the University of Navarre, validated for Spain [12]. This questionnaire categorizes cocoa consumption as follows: Never, 1-3 servings/month, weekly, 2-4 servings/week, 5-6 servings/week, daily, 2-3 servings/day, 4-6 servings/day, more than 6 servings/day. Cocoa intake was determined as follows: the average daily consumption (weight) of cocoa-containing foods and beverages was multiplied by their individual percentage of cocoa contents, which were derived from food labels and from published data. Cocoa intake from individual foods was summed to yield the actual intake of cocoa in grams per day for each subject. We posteriorly divided the subjects according to estimated cocoa consumption. Low cocoa consumption was taken to represent the intake of ≤ 1 serving/week.

Procedures for measuring office and ambulatory blood pressure, ankle-brachial index (ABI), body mass index, and abdominal waist circumference have been reported in a prior publication [13].

Central blood pressure (CBP) and central and peripheral augmentation index (CAIx, PAIx) were estimated using the SphygmoCor System (AtCor Medical Pty Ltd., Head Office, West Ryde, Australia). With the patient sitting and the arm resting on a rigid surface, pulse wave in radial artery was tested and used to estimate the aortic pulse wave using a mathematic transformation. Inter-observer reliability was assessed before the start of the study using an intraclass correlation of 0.974 (95% CI: 0.936-0.989) in repeated measures in 22 subjects and with Bland-Altman analysis, where inter-observer agreement limits were 0.454 (95% CI: -9.876-10.785). Using the SphygmoCor System (Vx pulse wave velocity), PWV was measured with the patient in the supine position, estimating the delay in pulse wave at carotid and femoral level as compared to the electrocardiogram wave. Ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) is defined as 1 minus the regression slope of 24-hour diastolic on systolic blood pressure [14].

Carotid ultrasonography to assess intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (C-IMT) was performed by two investigators specifically trained for that purpose. A Sonosite Micromax ultrasound device (Sonosite Inc., Bothell, Washington, USA) paired with a 5-10 MHz multifrequency high-resolution linear transducer with Sonocal software was used for performing automatic measurements of IMT, in order to optimize reproducibility. Reliability of this measurement was evaluated before study start using intraclass correlation coefficient, which showed values of 0.974 (95% CI: 0.935-0.990) for intra-observer agreement on repeated measurements in 20 subjects, and 0.897 (95% CI: 0.740-0.959) for inter-observer agreement. Six measurements were taken on each carotid artery, using average values (average IMT) and maximum values (maximum IMT) calculated by the software automatically. Measurements were taken following the recommendations of the Manheim Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Consensus [15]. Cardiovascular risk was estimated using the SCORE [16] and D'Agostino [17] equations.

Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative variables as frequency distributions. Association between qualitative variables was assessed using a Chi-square test, differences in means between groups with an ANOVA test, and a Scheffé test was used as a post hoc test with an alpha value < 0.05. We used a multivariate analysis based on the ANCOVA method (analysis of covariance), to compare the arterial stiffness variables between different cocoa-intake groups using as adjustment variables age, gender, systolic blood pressure, diabetes and the presence of medical treatment (antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs). SPSS/PC + version 18.0 statistical software was used (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Results

Sample consisted of 351 subjects (mean age 54.76 years, 62.4% males). Mean cocoa consumption of the global sample was 4.30 ± 9.08 g/day, with an intake among those who consumed some cocoa of 7.74 ± 11.04 g/day, and a median value of 2 g/day. Table 1 shows the clinical and demographic characteristics of the population, as well as measures of arterial stiffness, central and peripheral blood pressure, C-IMT, and consumption of energy and immediate principles. Non-cocoa consumers had an older mean age and a lower 24-hour diastolic blood pressure as compared to the other groups, and also lower proportions of diabetic and dyslipidemic patients (p < 0.05).

Table 1. General demographic and clinical characteristics

The proportion of patients treated with drugs was greater among the non-consumers of cocoa than in the high consumption group, referred to both the antihypertensive agents (53.80% vs 37.80%) and the lipid-lowering drugs (37.10% vs 15.70%). A higher proportion of males (30.59%) as compared to females (16.67%) reported high cocoa consumption.

PWV showed a significant difference between the non-consumers (9.22 m/sec) and the high consumption group (8.47 m/sec) (p = 0.039). However, in the multivariate analysis, on adjusting for age, gender, the presence of diabetes, systolic blood pressure and antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drug use, this difference disappeared. The power of the contrast was 81% for detecting differences in PWV between high consumers and non-consumers, and 42% between high consumers and low consumers. All other arterial stiffness measures showed no differences between the different consumption groups (Figure 1).

thumbnailFigure 1. Multivariate analysis (ANCOVA). Box plots of PWV, AASI, C-IMT, and PAIx in the different cocoa consumption groups. Mean (95% CI) adjusted for age, gender, the presence of diabetes, systolic blood pressure and antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drug use.

We re-analyzed the data, excluding the diabetics, without any modification of the results or conclusions obtained.

Discussion

Although there was a trend to a decreased arterial stiffness as cocoa consumption increased, data collected show that cocoa intake had no influence on arterial stiffness or C-IMT measurements, or on central and peripheral blood pressure values, in subjects with some cardiovascular risk factors.

Vlachopoulos et al. [7], found that regular cocoa intake is related to decreased aortic stiffness and improved central hemodynamics. In their study population, the mean cocoa intake in healthy individuals was 4.63 g/day. Similar amount in terms of cocoa-intake to those obtained in our study (4.30 g /day). The inconsistency between this study and our findings merits comments. While subjects in the previous trial were healthy, our study included subjects with some cardiovascular risk factor (hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia). These risk factors can influence the measures used to estimate arterial stiffness. In addition, many of the patients were receiving antihypertensive medication and lipid-lowering drugs, which may influence the results obtained. However, the interest of the study is that no previous evaluations have been made of the relationship between cocoa consumption and arterial stiffness in subjects of this kind.

However, data found in our population were similar to those collected by Ried K et al. [6], who concluded that cocoa was superior to placebo for reducing blood pressure in prehypertension. In the van den Bogaard B et al. study [8], cocoa increased 24-hour mean blood pressure and PWV, but decreased central systolic blood pressure and augmentation index. Thus, these authors did not also find a consistent relationship between cocoa intake and blood pressure and arterial stiffness measurements.

Djousse L and Lewis JR [9,10], recorded a inversely association between cocoa consumption and carotid atherosclerotic plaque prevalence. However, in coincidence of our study, no significant relationship was found between C-IMT and cocoa intake. There are several possible explanations for this results. In our study, the three groups of cocoa-intake are very heterogenous with differences in age, gender and the proportion of subjects with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs. This fact may influence the results.

A limitation of the study is the statistical power because may not be sufficient to detect differences between cocoa-intake groups that could really exist in the population.

Conclusions

In conclusion, in subjects with some cardiovascular risk factors, cocoa consumption does not imply improvement in the arterial stiffness values. However, further studies specifically designed to test the relationship are needed.

Abbreviations

CBP: Central blood pressure; C-IMT: Intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery; PWV: Pulse wave velocity; CAIx: Central augmentation index; PAIx: Peripheral augmentation index; AASI: Ambulatory arterial stiffness index; ABI: Ankle-brachial index.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JIR: devised the study, designed the protocol, participated in fund raising, interpretation of results, prepared the manuscript draft and corrected the final version of the manuscript. MAG and ER participated in the study design, interpretation of results, and manuscript review. CA participated in the study design, data collection and manuscript review. MCP performed all analytical methods, interpretation of results, and manuscript review. LG participated in the protocol design, fund raising, analysis of results, and final review of the manuscript. Finally, all authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors' information

JIR (Nurse and dietitian). Member of the cardiovascular research group (RETICS RD06/0018/0027, REDIAPP) Carlos III Institute of Health of the Spanish Ministry of Health, SACYL. MAG and LG are MD, associate professors at the Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca and members of the cardiovascular research group (RETICS RD06/0018/0027, REDIAPP) Carlos III Institute of Health of the Spanish Ministry of Health, SACYL. CA (nurse) and ER (MD) are members of the cardiovascular research group (RETICS RD06/0018/0027, REDIAPP) Carlos III Institute of Health of the Spanish Ministry of Health, SACYL. MCP (PhD) is an Assistant professor at the Statistics Department, University of Salamanca.

Acknowledgements

This project has been supported by the Castille and León Health Service (GRS 498/A/10), Carlos III Institute of Health of the Spanish Ministry of Health (RETICS RD06/0018/0027), and Infosalud Foundation.

References

  1. Djousse L, Hopkins PN, North KE, Pankow JS, Arnett DK, Ellison RC: Chocolate consumption is inversely associated with prevalent coronary heart disease: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study.

    Clin Nutr 2011, 30:182-187. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Buijsse B, Weikert C, Drogan D, Bergmann M, Boeing H: Chocolate consumption in relation to blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular disease in German adults.

    Eur Heart J 2010, 31:1616-1623. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Buitrago-Lopez A, Sanderson J, Johnson L, Warnakula S, Wood A, Di Angelantonio E, Franco OH: Chocolate consumption and cardiometabolic disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    BMJ 2011, 343:d4488. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Khawaja O, Gaziano JM, Djousse L: Chocolate and coronary heart disease: a systematic review.

    Curr Atheroscler Rep 2011, 13:447-452. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Corti R, Flammer AJ, Hollenberg NK, Luscher TF: Cocoa and cardiovascular health.

    Circulation 2009, 119:1433-1441. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Ried K, Sullivan T, Fakler P, Frank OR, Stocks NP: Does chocolate reduce blood pressure? A meta-analysis.

    BMC Med 2010, 8:39. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  7. Vlachopoulos CV, Alexopoulos NA, Aznaouridis KA, Ioakeimidis NC, Dima IA, Dagre A, Vasiliadou C, Stefanadi EC, Stefanadis CI: Relation of habitual cocoa consumption to aortic stiffness and wave reflections, and to central hemodynamics in healthy individuals.

    Am J Cardiol 2007, 99:1473-1475. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. van den Bogaard B, Draijer R, Westerhof BE, van den Meiracker AH, van Montfrans GA, van den Born BJ: Effects on peripheral and central blood pressure of cocoa with natural or high-dose theobromine: a randomized, double-blind crossover trial.

    Hypertension 2010, 56:839-846. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Djousse L, Hopkins PN, Arnett DK, Pankow JS, Borecki I, North KE, Curtis Ellison R: Chocolate consumption is inversely associated with calcified atherosclerotic plaque in the coronary arteries: the NHLBI Family Heart Study.

    Clin Nutr 2011, 30:38-43. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  10. Lewis JR, Prince RL, Zhu K, Devine A, Thompson PL, Hodgson JM: Habitual chocolate intake and vascular disease: a prospective study of clinical outcomes in older women.

    Arch Intern Med 2010, 170:1857-1858. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects.

    JAMA 1997, 277:925-926. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  12. Martin-Moreno JM, Boyle P, Gorgojo L, Maisonneuve P, Fernandez-Rodriguez JC, Salvini S, Willett WC: Development and validation of a food frequency questionnaire in Spain.

    Int J Epidemiol 1993, 22:512-519. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Garcia-Ortiz L, Ramos-Delgado E, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Agudo-Conde C, Martinez-Salgado C, Patino-Alonso MC, Rodriguez-Sanchez E, Gomez-Marcos MA, Group FV: Peripheral and central arterial pressure and its relationship to vascular target organ damage in carotid artery, retina and arterial stiffness. Development and validation of a tool. The Vaso risk study.

    BMC Public Health 2011, 11:266. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  14. Dolan E, Thijs L, Li Y, Atkins N, McCormack P, McClory S, O'Brien E, Staessen JA, Stanton AV: Ambulatory arterial stiffness index as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in the Dublin Outcome Study.

    Hypertension 2006, 47:365-370. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N, Csiba L, Desvarieux M, Ebrahim S, Fatar M, et al.: Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness consensus (2004-2006). An update on behalf of the Advisory Board of the 3rd and 4th Watching the Risk Symposium, 13th and 15th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, and Brussels, Belgium, 2006.

    Cerebrovasc Dis 2007, 23:75-80. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Ducimetiere P, Jousilahti P, Keil U, et al.: Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project.

    Eur Heart J 2003, 24:987-1003. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. D'Agostino RB Sr, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, Kannel WB: General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study.

    Circulation 2008, 117:743-753. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL