Table 3 |
||||||||
|
Composition and HI of the test meals. |
||||||||
|
Meals |
Weight |
Available starch |
Protein |
Fat |
Insoluble fibres |
Soluble fibres |
Total fibres |
HI |
|
|
||||||||
|
g/serving |
||||||||
|
WWB |
101.1 |
40.0 |
6.2 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
100 a |
|
WWP |
273.3 |
38.2 |
5.7 |
1.1 |
2.1 |
0.5 |
2.6 |
85 ± 4.4 bc |
|
ERB |
106.2 |
40.0 |
5.2 |
1.3 |
4.2 |
2.5 |
6.7 |
83 ± 1.8 bc |
|
ERP |
227.6 |
37.7 |
4.6 |
1.3 |
4.9 |
1.7 |
6.5 |
89 ± 3.6 b |
|
WGRB |
123.4 |
40.0 |
6.5 |
1.9 |
6.8 |
2.8 |
9.6 |
101 ± 3.1 a |
|
WGRB-lac |
122.6 |
40.0 |
6.3 |
2.0 |
7.4 |
2.9 |
10.2 |
94 ± 4.4 ab |
|
WGRP |
258.2 |
38.6 |
5.4 |
1.7 |
7.9 |
2.2 |
10.1 |
72 ± 2.4 c |
|
RBB |
141.7 |
40.0 |
9.7 |
2.6 |
10.3 |
2.0 |
12.3 |
93 ± 2.3 ab |
|
|
||||||||
|
HI values are means ± SEM, n = 6. Products not sharing the same letters were significantly different, p < 0.05 (ANOVA, followed by Tukey's test). |
||||||||
|
Rosén et al. Nutrition Journal 2009 8:42 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-42 |
||||||||