<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Nutrition Journal - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Nutrition Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/4/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/6/1/35" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/7/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/11/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/11/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/2/1/7" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/4/1/24">
        <title>Childhood obesity, prevalence and prevention</title>
        <description>Childhood obesity has reached epidemic levels in developed countries. Twenty five percent of children in the US are overweight and 11% are obese. Overweight and obesity in childhood are known to have significant impact on both physical and psychological health. The mechanism of obesity development is not fully understood and it is believed to be a disorder with multiple causes. Environmental factors, lifestyle preferences, and cultural environment play pivotal roles in the rising prevalence of obesity worldwide. In general, overweight and obesity are assumed to be the results of an increase in caloric and fat intake. On the other hand, there are supporting evidence that excessive sugar intake by soft drink, increased portion size, and steady decline in physical activity have been playing major roles in the rising rates of obesity all around the world. Consequently, both over-consumption of calories and reduced physical activity are involved in childhood obesity.Almost all researchers agree that prevention could be the key strategy for controlling the current epidemic of obesity. Prevention may include primary prevention of overweight or obesity, secondary prevention or prevention of weight regains following weight loss, and avoidance of more weight increase in obese persons unable to lose weight. Until now, most approaches have focused on changing the behaviour of individuals in diet and exercise. It seems, however, that these strategies have had little impact on the growing increase of the obesity epidemic. While about 50% of the adults are overweight and obese in many countries, it is difficult to reduce excessive weight once it becomes established. Children should therefore be considered the priority population for intervention strategies. Prevention may be achieved through a variety of interventions targeting built environment, physical activity, and diet. Some of these potential strategies for intervention in children can be implemented by targeting preschool institutions, schools or after-school care services as natural setting for influencing the diet and physical activity. All in all, there is an urgent need to initiate prevention and treatment of obesity in children.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/4/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Mahshid Dehghan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Noori Akhtar-Danesh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anwar Merchant</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2005, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-09-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-4-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-4-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-09-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/6/1/35">
        <title>A survey of energy drink consumption patterns among college students</title>
        <description>Background:
Energy drink consumption has continued to gain in popularity since the 1997 debut of Red Bull, the current leader in the energy drink market. Although energy drinks are targeted to young adult consumers, there has been little research regarding energy drink consumption patterns among college students in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine energy drink consumption patterns among college students, prevalence and frequency of energy drink use for six situations, namely for insufficient sleep, to increase energy (in general), while studying, driving long periods of time, drinking with alcohol while partying, and to treat a hangover, and prevalence of adverse side effects and energy drink use dose effects among college energy drink users.
Methods:
Based on the responses from a 32 member college student focus group and a field test, a 19 item survey was used to assess energy drink consumption patterns of 496 randomly surveyed college students attending a state university in the Central Atlantic region of the United States.
Results:
Fifty one percent of participants (n = 253) reported consuming greater than one energy drink each month in an average month for the current semester (defined as energy drink user). The majority of users consumed energy drinks for insufficient sleep (67%), to increase energy (65%), and to drink with alcohol while partying (54%). The majority of users consumed one energy drink to treat most situations although using three or more was a common practice to drink with alcohol while partying (49%). Weekly jolt and crash episodes were experienced by 29% of users, 22% reported ever having headaches, and 19% heart palpitations from consuming energy drinks. There was a significant dose effect only for jolt and crash episodes.
Conclusion:
Using energy drinks is a popular practice among college students for a variety of situations. Although for the majority of situations assessed, users consumed one energy drink with a reported frequency of 1 &#8211; 4 days per month, many users consumed three or more when combining with alcohol while partying. Further, side effects from consuming energy drinks are fairly common, and a significant dose effect was found with jolt and crash episodes. Future research should identify if college students recognize the amounts of caffeine that are present in the wide variety of caffeine-containing products that they are consuming, the amounts of caffeine that they are consuming in various situations, and the physical side effects associated with caffeine consumption.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/6/1/35</link>
                <dc:creator>Brenda Malinauskas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victor Aeby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reginald Overton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tracy Carpenter-Aeby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kimberly Barber-Heidal</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2007, null:35</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-6-35</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-6-35-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/5">
        <title>Apple phytochemicals and their health benefits</title>
        <description>Evidence suggests that a diet high in fruits and vegetables may decrease the risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and cancer, and phytochemicals including phenolics, flavonoids and carotenoids from fruits and vegetables may play a key role in reducing chronic disease risk. Apples are a widely consumed, rich source of phytochemicals, and epidemiological studies have linked the consumption of apples with reduced risk of some cancers, cardiovascular disease, asthma, and diabetes. In the laboratory, apples have been found to have very strong antioxidant activity, inhibit cancer cell proliferation, decrease lipid oxidation, and lower cholesterol. Apples contain a variety of phytochemicals, including quercetin, catechin, phloridzin and chlorogenic acid, all of which are strong antioxidants. The phytochemical composition of apples varies greatly between different varieties of apples, and there are also small changes in phytochemicals during the maturation and ripening of the fruit. Storage has little to no effect on apple phytochemicals, but processing can greatly affect apple phytochemicals. While extensive research exists, a literature review of the health benefits of apples and their phytochemicals has not been compiled to summarize this work. The purpose of this paper is to review the most recent literature regarding the health benefits of apples and their phytochemicals, phytochemical bioavailability and antioxidant behavior, and the effects of variety, ripening, storage and processing on apple phytochemicals.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Jeanelle Boyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rui Hai Liu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2004, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-05-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-3-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-3-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-05-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/7/1/2">
        <title>Nutritional therapies for mental health disorders</title>
        <description>According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4 out of the 10 leading causes of disability in the US and other developed countries are mental disorders. Major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) are among the most common mental disorders that currently plague numerous countries and have varying incidence rates from 26 percent in America to 4 percent in China. Though some of this difference may be attributable to the manner in which individual healthcare providers diagnose mental disorders, this noticeable distribution can be also explained by studies which show that a lack of certain dietary nutrients contribute to the development of mental disorders. Notably, essential vitamins, minerals, and omega-3 fatty acids are often deficient in the general population in America and other developed countries; and are exceptionally deficient in patients suffering from mental disorders. Studies have shown that daily supplements of vital nutrients often effectively reduce patients&apos; symptoms. Supplements that contain amino acids also reduce symptoms, because they are converted to neurotransmitters that alleviate depression and other mental disorders. Based on emerging scientific evidence, this form of nutritional supplement treatment may be appropriate for controlling major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and anxiety disorders, eating disorders, attention deficit disorder/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD), addiction, and autism. The aim of this manuscript is to emphasize which dietary supplements can aid the treatment of the four most common mental disorders currently affecting America and other developed countries: major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD).Most antidepressants and other prescription drugs cause severe side effects, which usually discourage patients from taking their medications. Such noncompliant patients who have mental disorders are at a higher risk for committing suicide or being institutionalized. One way for psychiatrists to overcome this noncompliance is to educate themselves about alternative or complementary nutritional treatments. Although in the cases of certain nutrients, further research needs to be done to determine the best recommended doses of most nutritional supplements, psychiatrists can recommend doses of dietary supplements based on previous and current efficacious studies and then adjust the doses based on the results obtained.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/7/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Shaheen Lakhan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Vieira</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2008, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-01-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-7-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-7-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/11/1/7">
        <title>Intravenous Vitamin C Administration Reduces Fatigue in Office Workers: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Studies of the efficacy of vitamin C treatment for fatigue have yielded inconsistent results. One of the reasons for this inconsistency could be the difference in delivery routes. Therefore, we planned a clinical trial with intravenous vitamin C administration.
Methods:
We evaluated the effect of intravenous vitamin C on fatigue in office workers. A group of 141 healthy volunteers, aged 20 to 49 years participated in this randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. The trial group received 10 grams of vitamin C with normal saline intravenously, while the placebo group received normal saline only. Since vitamin C is a well-known antioxidant, oxidative stress was measured. Fatigue score, oxidative stress, and plasma vitamin C levels were measured before intervention, and again two hours and one day after intervention. Adverse events were monitored.
Results:
The fatigue scores measured at two hours after intervention and one day after intervention were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.004); fatigue scores decreased in the vitamin C group after two hours and remained lower for one day. Trial also led to higher plasma vitamin C levels and lower oxidative stress compared to the placebo group (p &lt; 0.001, p &lt; 0.001, respectively). When data analysis was refined by dividing each group into high-baseline and low-baseline subgroups, it was observed that fatigue was reduced in the lower baseline vitamin C level group after two hours and after one day (p = 0.004). The same did not hold for the higher baseline group (p = 0.206).
Conclusion:
Thus, intravenous vitamin C reduced fatigue at two hours, and the effect persisted for one day. There were no significant differences in adverse events between two groups. High dose intravenous vitamin C proved to be safe and effective against fatigue in this study.Trial RegistrationThe clinical trial registration of this trial is http://ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT00633581.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/11/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Sang-Yeon Suh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Woo Kyung Bae</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hong-Yup Ahn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sung-Eun Choi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gyou-Chul Jung</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chang Hwan Yeom</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2012, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-11-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-11-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/3">
        <title>The total antioxidant content of more than 3100 foods, beverages, spices, herbs and supplements used worldwide</title>
        <description>Background:
A plant-based diet protects against chronic oxidative stress-related diseases. Dietary plants contain variable chemical families and amounts of antioxidants. It has been hypothesized that plant antioxidants may contribute to the beneficial health effects of dietary plants. Our objective was to develop a comprehensive food database consisting of the total antioxidant content of typical foods as well as other dietary items such as traditional medicine plants, herbs and spices and dietary supplements. This database is intended for use in a wide range of nutritional research, from in vitro and cell and animal studies, to clinical trials and nutritional epidemiological studies.
Methods:
We procured samples from countries worldwide and assayed the samples for their total antioxidant content using a modified version of the FRAP assay. Results and sample information (such as country of origin, product and/or brand name) were registered for each individual food sample and constitute the Antioxidant Food Table.
Results:
The results demonstrate that there are several thousand-fold differences in antioxidant content of foods. Spices, herbs and supplements include the most antioxidant rich products in our study, some exceptionally high. Berries, fruits, nuts, chocolate, vegetables and products thereof constitute common foods and beverages with high antioxidant values.
Conclusions:
This database is to our best knowledge the most comprehensive Antioxidant Food Database published and it shows that plant-based foods introduce significantly more antioxidants into human diet than non-plant foods. Because of the large variations observed between otherwise comparable food samples the study emphasizes the importance of using a comprehensive database combined with a detailed system for food registration in clinical and epidemiological studies. The present antioxidant database is therefore an essential research tool to further elucidate the potential health effects of phytochemical antioxidants in diet.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Monica Carlsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bente Halvorsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kari Holte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Siv Bohn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steinar Dragland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Sampson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Willey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Haruki Senoo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yuko Umezono</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chiho Sanada</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingrid Barikmo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nega Berhe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Walter Willett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katherine Phillips</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Jacobs</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rune Blomhoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2010, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-9-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/9">
        <title>Weight Science:Evaluating the Evidence for a Paradigm Shift
</title>
        <description>Current guidelines recommend that &quot;overweight&quot; and &quot;obese&quot; individuals lose weight through engaging in lifestyle modification involving diet, exercise and other behavior change. This approach reliably induces short term weight loss, but the majority of individuals are unable to maintain weight loss over the long term and do not achieve the putative benefits of improved morbidity and mortality. Concern has arisen that this weight focus is not only ineffective at producing thinner, healthier bodies, but may also have unintended consequences, contributing to food and body preoccupation, repeated cycles of weight loss and regain, distraction from other personal health goals and wider health determinants, reduced self-esteem, eating disorders, other health decrement, and weight stigmatization and discrimination. This concern has drawn increased attention to the ethical implications of recommending treatment that may be ineffective or damaging. A growing trans-disciplinary movement called Health at Every Size (HAES) challenges the value of promoting weight loss and dieting behavior and argues for a shift in focus to weight-neutral outcomes. Randomized controlled clinical trials indicate that a HAES approach is associated with statistically and clinically relevant improvements in physiological measures (e.g., blood pressure, blood lipids), health behaviors (e.g., eating and activity habits, dietary quality), and psychosocial outcomes (such as self-esteem and body image), and that HAES achieves these health outcomes more successfully than weight loss treatment and without the contraindications associated with a weight focus. This paper evaluates the evidence and rationale that justifies shifting the health care paradigm from a conventional weight focus to HAES.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/10/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Linda Bacon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lucy Aphramor</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2011, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-01-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-10-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-01-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/19">
        <title>Nutrition and cancer: A review of the evidence for an anti-cancer diet</title>
        <description>It has been estimated that 30&#8211;40 percent of all cancers can be prevented by lifestyle and dietary measures alone. Obesity, nutrient sparse foods such as concentrated sugars and refined flour products that contribute to impaired glucose metabolism (which leads to diabetes), low fiber intake, consumption of red meat, and imbalance of omega 3 and omega 6 fats all contribute to excess cancer risk. Intake of flax seed, especially its lignan fraction, and abundant portions of fruits and vegetables will lower cancer risk. Allium and cruciferous vegetables are especially beneficial, with broccoli sprouts being the densest source of sulforophane. Protective elements in a cancer prevention diet include selenium, folic acid, vitamin B-12, vitamin D, chlorophyll, and antioxidants such as the carotenoids (&#945;-carotene, &#946;-carotene, lycopene, lutein, cryptoxanthin). Ascorbic acid has limited benefits orally, but could be very beneficial intravenously. Supplementary use of oral digestive enzymes and probiotics also has merit as anticancer dietary measures. When a diet is compiled according to the guidelines here it is likely that there would be at least a 60&#8211;70 percent decrease in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers, and even a 40&#8211;50 percent decrease in lung cancer, along with similar reductions in cancers at other sites. Such a diet would be conducive to preventing cancer and would favor recovery from cancer as well.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Donaldson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2004, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-10-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-3-19</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-3-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-10-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/11/1/4">
        <title>Wild bitter gourd improves metabolic syndrome: A preliminary dietary supplementation trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) is a common tropical vegetable that has been used in traditional or folk medicine to treat diabetes. Wild bitter gourd (WBG) ameliorated metabolic syndrome (MetS) in animal models. We aimed to preliminarily evaluate the effect of WBG supplementation on MetS in Taiwanese adults.
Methods:
A preliminary open-label uncontrolled supplementation trial was conducted in eligible fulfilled the diagnosis of MetS from May 2008 to April 2009. A total of 42 eligible (21 men and 21 women) with a mean age of 45.7+/- 11.4 years (23 to 63 years) were supplemented with 4.8 gram lyophilized WBG powder in capsules daily for three months and were checked for MetS at enrollment and follow-up monthly. After supplementation was ceased, the participants were continually checked for MetS monthly over an additional three-month period. MetS incidence rate were analyzed using repeated-measures generalized linear mixed models according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Results:
After adjusting for sex and age, the MetS incidence rate (standard error, p value) decreased by 7.1% (3.7%, 0.920), 9.5% (4.3%, 0.451), 19.0% (5.7%, 0.021), 16.7% (5.4%, 0.047), 11.9% (4.7%, 0.229) and 11.9% (4.7%, 0.229) at visit 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 compared to that at baseline (visit 1), respectively. The decrease in incidence rate was highest at the end of the three-month supplementation period and it was significantly different from that at baseline (p=0.021). The difference remained significant at end of the 4th month (one month after the cessation of supplementation) (p=0.047) but the effect diminished at the 5th and 6th months after baseline. The waist circumference also significantly decreased after the supplementation (p&lt;0.05). The WBG supplementation was generally well-tolerated.
Conclusion:
This is the first report to show that WBG improved MetS in human which provides a firm base for further randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of WBG supplementation.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/11/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Chung-Huang Tsai</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Emily Chin-Fun Chen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hsin-Sheng Tsay</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ching-jang Huang</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-11-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-11-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-13T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/2/1/7">
        <title>Vitamin C in human health and disease is still a mystery ? An overview</title>
        <description>Ascorbic acid is one of the important water soluble vitamins. It is essential for collagen, carnitine and neurotransmitters biosynthesis. Most plants and animals synthesize ascorbic acid for their own requirement. However, apes and humans can not synthesize ascorbic acid due to lack of an enzyme gulonolactone oxidase. Hence, ascorbic acid has to be supplemented mainly through fruits, vegetables and tablets. The current US recommended daily allowance (RDA) for ascorbic acid ranges between 100&#8211;120 mg/per day for adults. Many health benefits have been attributed to ascorbic acid such as antioxidant, anti-atherogenic, anti-carcinogenic, immunomodulator and prevents cold etc. However, lately the health benefits of ascorbic acid has been the subject of debate and controversies viz., Danger of mega doses of ascorbic acid? Does ascorbic acid act as a antioxidant or pro-oxidant ? Does ascorbic acid cause cancer or may interfere with cancer therapy? However, the Panel on dietary antioxidants and related compounds stated that the in vivo data do not clearly show a relationship between excess ascorbic acid intake and kidney stone formation, pro-oxidant effects, excess iron absorption. A number of clinical and epidemiological studies on anti-carcinogenic effects of ascorbic acid in humans did not show any conclusive beneficial effects on various types of cancer except gastric cancer. Recently, a few derivatives of ascorbic acid were tested on cancer cells, among them ascorbic acid esters showed promising anticancer activity compared to ascorbic acid. Ascorbyl stearate was found to inhibit proliferation of human cancer cells by interfering with cell cycle progression, induced apoptosis by modulation of signal transduction pathways. However, more mechanistic and human in vivo studies are needed to understand and elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the anti-carcinogenic property of ascorbic acid. Thus, though ascorbic acid was discovered in 17th century, the exact role of this vitamin/nutraceutical in human biology and health is still a mystery in view of many beneficial claims and controversies.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/2/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Kamatham Naidu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2003, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2003-08-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-2-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-2891-2-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2003-08-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

